George Orwell (mentioned here last month in errata) posited humans would hate the idea of constant surveillance.
Turns out, we dig it large - at least if it's "men", and not "The Man", who're watching.
Blogs are a fair example of how, given our own terms and voices, we love to splay open, sometimes messily, our inner feelings, aspirations, observations and creations for a theoretical (and theoretically vast - yet intimate) audience.
It seems facetious to quote
Shakespeare, but life
can be a stage.
Where I'll dare to expand the Bard's assertion is to say, within our roles and responsibilities as employees, family members, friends and lovers even (loosely, "official" capacities), the stage is much like that in the theater, where we exchange our tragic and comic masks (among others) to "put on the best face" for a temporally present and captive audience, as it were.
On the web, in the blog - I would suggest - we get a more direct link (har har) to someone's inner machinery, their more raw and unpolished cogs of personality.
Can I go so far as to say, if everyday face-to-face life is a "stage" (sometimes a "screen", if we aim larger than life and have decent eyes), words and pictures on a monitor (like words and pictures on paper, possibly) are a "book" (for lack of a corresponding physical setting where written narrative is staged).
By that I mean, rather than preoccupy ourselves with appearances, outer dialogues, visible actions in the "real world", here we're concerned with what some can't disclose in person: their unspoken secrets, cherished hopes and dreams, closely-guarded shames and hesitations...what they "really think".
Is the web the best way we've found yet to achieve that universal inner connection some folk have sought for centuries? Is it the killer app for shared consciousness?
I'm reminded of
Dan Simmons' "datasphere" from the
Ilium/
Olympos cycle of novels, something a little
juicier and more inclusive than
William Gibson's earlier (and equally prescient) conception of
"the matrix", or
cyberspace (which seemed less about connecting people than it did making cold, hard information available to those with the skill to access it). The old
ARPANET vs. the
interweb?
Whatevah.
Our cyberspace of today, our datasphere, is more cluttered and searching, more base and primal, than either of the above fictional constructs. If we choose to engage on a certain level, it feels...human.
An old question, yes, but I'm still asking it. Though technology distances us, can it nonetheless facilitate an intimacy of mind?
You tell me.
P.S. The link that inspired this ramble just sort of mysteriously appeared one day in my Favorites list. I never put it there myself.
Thank you,
Big Brother.
Be Your Own Big BrotherLabels: books, interweb, participaction